<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Graham Readfearn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.readfearn.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.readfearn.com</link>
	<description>Sustainability, climate change, environment, coffee and stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:31:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Zombie climate sceptic theories survive only in newspapers, TV &#124; marketspace</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13334</link>
		<dc:creator>Zombie climate sceptic theories survive only in newspapers, TV &#124; marketspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 10:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13334</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s The Australian newspaper which earlier this month concocted a story of a fake debate between scientists about a coming ice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s The Australian newspaper which earlier this month concocted a story of a fake debate between scientists about a coming ice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carbon bombs scrubbing Australia&#8217;s emissions cut by Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/02/carbon-bombs-scrubbing-australias-emissions-cut/comment-page-1/#comment-13318</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1388#comment-13318</guid>
		<description>Hello,

It is clear that something needs to change... From BOTH perspectives. Maybe collaboration is what is in order...... A few good ideas from you.... A few good ideas from others.... You both seem passionate about the topic so why argue when you can be doing something productive! Something has to crumble and I would rather it be our economic system than the world around us. It is never too late to try!

Nice comments on both sides. Thanks for the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>It is clear that something needs to change&#8230; From BOTH perspectives. Maybe collaboration is what is in order&#8230;&#8230; A few good ideas from you&#8230;. A few good ideas from others&#8230;. You both seem passionate about the topic so why argue when you can be doing something productive! Something has to crumble and I would rather it be our economic system than the world around us. It is never too late to try!</p>
<p>Nice comments on both sides. Thanks for the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Media Manipulation: Fox News Ordered to Downplay Global Warming &#171; DarkGovernment</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13265</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Manipulation: Fox News Ordered to Downplay Global Warming &#171; DarkGovernment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13265</guid>
		<description>[...] there&#8217;s The Australian newspaper which earlier this month concocted a story of a fake debate between scientists about a coming ice [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there&#8217;s The Australian newspaper which earlier this month concocted a story of a fake debate between scientists about a coming ice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Another Week of Anthropocene Antics, May 12, 2013 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13147</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Week of Anthropocene Antics, May 12, 2013 &#8211; A Few Things Ill Considered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13147</guid>
		<description>[...] 2013/05/10: GReadfearn: The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ag... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2013/05/10: GReadfearn: The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ag&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13058</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 13:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13058</guid>
		<description>Media Watch getting this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media Watch getting this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Alarmists at The Australian herald new ice age, forget they promoted ice age five years ago &#124; Climate Wars</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13043</link>
		<dc:creator>Alarmists at The Australian herald new ice age, forget they promoted ice age five years ago &#124; Climate Wars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 06:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13043</guid>
		<description>[...] Graham Readfearn has noted, the quotes used for this dubious claim are over five years old: Here’s the real news. The quotes which Lloyd uses from Abdussamatov are actually more than five [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graham Readfearn has noted, the quotes used for this dubious claim are over five years old: Here’s the real news. The quotes which Lloyd uses from Abdussamatov are actually more than five [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Fran Barlow</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13035</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 01:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13035</guid>
		<description>Interestingly, PSI&#039;s quote from Manabe &amp; Weatherald (1967)

&lt;blockquote&gt;If one discusses the effect of carbon dioxide upon the climate of the earth’s surface based upon these results, one could conclude that the greater the amount of carbon dioxide, the colder would be the temperature of the earth’s surface.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

 seems to be a classic quote mining trick.

They don&#039;t cite the paper (despite making a fuss about the date given by Miscount Monckton, but it comes from the M&amp;W paper &quot;Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere With a Given Distribution of Relative Humidity&quot; (see p104).

The argument is too long to quote here, but the cite in question explains (drawing upon Bolz &amp; Falkenberg (1950)), by the end of the paragraph, why precisely the &lt;em&gt;opposite&lt;/em&gt; conclusion should be drawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly, PSI&#8217;s quote from Manabe &amp; Weatherald (1967)</p>
<blockquote><p>If one discusses the effect of carbon dioxide upon the climate of the earth’s surface based upon these results, one could conclude that the greater the amount of carbon dioxide, the colder would be the temperature of the earth’s surface.</p></blockquote>
<p> seems to be a classic quote mining trick.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t cite the paper (despite making a fuss about the date given by Miscount Monckton, but it comes from the M&amp;W paper &#8220;Thermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere With a Given Distribution of Relative Humidity&#8221; (see p104).</p>
<p>The argument is too long to quote here, but the cite in question explains (drawing upon Bolz &amp; Falkenberg (1950)), by the end of the paragraph, why precisely the <em>opposite</em> conclusion should be drawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Fran Barlow</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13034</link>
		<dc:creator>Fran Barlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 00:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13034</guid>
		<description>Thanks Graham

Excellent as usual.

NB:  &quot;and it’s chief executive &quot; ... apostrophe catastrophe ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Graham</p>
<p>Excellent as usual.</p>
<p>NB:  &#8220;and it’s chief executive &#8221; &#8230; apostrophe catastrophe <img src='http://www.readfearn.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by The Australian newspaper loses any last shreds of scientific credibility &#124; Science or not?</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13029</link>
		<dc:creator>The Australian newspaper loses any last shreds of scientific credibility &#124; Science or not?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 21:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13029</guid>
		<description>[...] Graham Readfearn: The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Graham Readfearn: The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Australian Brings You The Climate Science Denial News From Five Years Ago by Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov &#124; the Climate Denier List</title>
		<link>http://www.readfearn.com/2013/05/the-australian-brings-you-the-climate-science-denial-news-from-five-years-ago/comment-page-1/#comment-13024</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov &#124; the Climate Denier List</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.readfearn.com/?p=1552#comment-13024</guid>
		<description>[...] Australian newspaper recycled the &#8216;news&#8217; from an article from 2007 and is reviewed here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Australian newspaper recycled the &#8216;news&#8217; from an article from 2007 and is reviewed here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
