Until such time as I come up with something approaching an official and consistent policy on comments, this is the “vibe of the thing”.
- If all or most of your comment consists of name-calling and juvenile abuse, it’ll be deleted
- If the comment is utterly off topic, it might be deleted, unless it sparkles with wit and intelligence
- If it’s defamatory and without proof, then it’ll be deleted
- If it disagrees with me, it will be welcomed in absence of contravention of the above
- If it’s a complaint that your comment hasn’t been moderated, bear in mind I’m a human with a life, wife and children
- If you use lots of block capitals to get all SHOUTY and angry, then it’ll get toasted
As a general rule, robust debate and a bit of banter is welcome. Telling me or someone else to go get %$#&% and such like doesn’t count. I reserve the right to be inconsistent. Extremely clever put downs may, on certain days, make it through the filter.


Pingback: Comment policy « Graham Readfearn
#1 by Charles Russell on December 26, 2012 - 6:19 pm
Quote
Hi Graham,
My reading of the sentence in the AR4 draft “observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism” seems not to have been adequately dealt with by professor Sherwood as he only discounts one of a number of possible mechanisms, namely the ” such as” a GCR-cloud link.
Kind Regards
Charles Russell